Analytical Reasoning, also known as Logic Games, is one of the most challenging yet rewarding sections of the LSAT. Mastering this part requires strong skills in setting up rules, making deductions, and eliminating incorrect options efficiently. In this set, we bring you 10 high-quality LSAT logic games (Games 1–10) designed to mirror real exam conditions. Each game comes with a scenario, rules, carefully explained answers, and reasoning steps to strengthen your problem-solving ability. Whether you are aiming for a top LSAT score or just starting your prep, these free practice games will help you build accuracy, speed, and confidence for test day.
LSAT Logic Games Practice – Part 1 (Games 1–10)
Game 1 – Sequencing (Simple Ordering)
Scenario:
Six students — A, B, C, D, E, and F — are scheduled to give presentations on six consecutive days, one per day (Day 1–Day 6).
Rules:
- A must present before C.
- D must present after B.
- F must present on Day 6.
- E must present immediately before A.
Questions:
- Which of the following could be the correct order?
- (A) E, A, B, D, C, F
- (B) B, D, E, A, C, F
- (C) E, B, A, D, C, F
- (D) A, E, B, D, C, F
Explanation:
- Rule 4 → E must come before A, and they are consecutive.
- Rule 1 → A before C.
- Rule 2 → B before D.
- Rule 3 → F fixed at Day 6.
- Only (A) E, A, B, D, C, F satisfies all rules.
Answer: (A)
Game 2 – Grouping (Two Groups)
Scenario:
A law firm assigns six associates (J, K, L, M, N, O) to two projects: Project X and Project Y.
Rules:
- J and K cannot be on the same project.
- M must be on Project X.
- N and O must be together.
- L must be on Project Y.
Question:
Which grouping is valid?
- (A) X: J, M, N, O | Y: K, L
- (B) X: K, M, N, O | Y: J, L
- (C) X: J, K, M | Y: L, N, O
- (D) X: J, L, N, O | Y: K, M
Explanation:
- Rule 2 → M in X.
- Rule 3 → N and O together.
- Rule 4 → L in Y.
- Rule 1 → J and K separate.
- Only (B) X: K, M, N, O | Y: J, L works.
Answer: (B)
Game 3 – Sequencing (Conditional Order)
Scenario:
Five witnesses (P, Q, R, S, T) testify in sequence.
Rules:
- P must testify before R.
- Q must testify immediately after S.
- T must testify last.
Question:
If S testifies first, which order is possible?
- (A) S, Q, P, R, T
- (B) S, Q, R, P, T
- (C) S, P, Q, R, T
- (D) P, S, Q, R, T
Explanation:
- Rule 2 → S and Q consecutive. If S first → order starts S, Q.
- Rule 1 → P before R.
- Rule 3 → T last.
- Only (A) S, Q, P, R, T works.
Answer: (A)
Game 4 – Matching (Applicants & Firms)
Scenario:
Three law graduates (U, V, W) are assigned to three law firms (Firm 1, Firm 2, Firm 3). Each firm hires exactly one graduate.
Rules:
- U cannot work at Firm 1.
- V must work at Firm 2.
- W cannot work at Firm 3.
Question:
Which assignment is valid?
- (A) U → Firm 2, V → Firm 1, W → Firm 3
- (B) U → Firm 3, V → Firm 2, W → Firm 1
- (C) U → Firm 1, V → Firm 2, W → Firm 3
- (D) U → Firm 2, V → Firm 3, W → Firm 1
Explanation:
- Rule 2 → V fixed at Firm 2.
- Rule 1 → U not Firm 1.
- Rule 3 → W not Firm 3.
- Only (B) U → Firm 3, V → Firm 2, W → Firm 1 works.
Answer: (B)
Game 5 – Advanced Grouping (Committees)
Scenario:
Seven professors (A–G) are divided into two committees: Curriculum (C) and Ethics (E).
Rules:
- A and B cannot be on the same committee.
- C must be with D.
- E must be in Ethics.
- G must be in Curriculum.
Question:
Which distribution is valid?
- (A) Curriculum: B, C, D, G | Ethics: A, E, F
- (B) Curriculum: A, C, D, G | Ethics: B, E, F
- (C) Curriculum: C, D, E, G | Ethics: A, B, F
- (D) Curriculum: A, B, G | Ethics: C, D, E, F
Explanation:
- Rule 3 → E fixed in Ethics.
- Rule 4 → G fixed in Curriculum.
- Rule 2 → C and D together.
- Rule 1 → A and B separate.
- Only (A) works.
Answer: (A)
Game 6 – Sequencing (Double Constraints)
Scenario:
Five cases (K, L, M, N, O) are scheduled over five consecutive days.
Rules:
- L must be earlier than O.
- K must be earlier than both M and N.
- O cannot be scheduled on Day 1.
Question:
If L is scheduled on Day 2, which of the following is possible?
- (A) K–L–M–N–O
- (B) L–K–M–O–N
- (C) K–L–N–M–O
- (D) L–N–K–M–O
Explanation:
- Rule 1 → L before O.
- Rule 2 → K before M and N.
- Rule 3 → O not on Day 1.
- Only (C) K–L–N–M–O fits all rules.
Answer: (C)
Game 7 – Grouping (Clients & Lawyers)
Scenario:
Three lawyers (X, Y, Z) each represent one or more of four clients (C1, C2, C3, C4). Each client has exactly one lawyer.
Rules:
- X must represent exactly two clients.
- Y must represent at least one client.
- C1 cannot be represented by Z.
- C3 and C4 must be represented by different lawyers.
Question:
Which assignment is valid?
- (A) X → C1, C2 | Y → C3 | Z → C4
- (B) X → C2, C3 | Y → C1, C4 | Z → none
- (C) X → C2, C4 | Y → C1 | Z → C3
- (D) X → C1, C4 | Y → C2 | Z → C3
Explanation:
- Rule 1 → X exactly two.
- Rule 2 → Y at least one.
- Rule 3 → C1 not with Z.
- Rule 4 → C3 ≠ C4.
- Only (C) satisfies all rules.
Answer: (C)
Game 8 – Matching (Judges & Courts)
Scenario:
Four judges (A, B, C, D) are each assigned to one of four courts (Civil, Criminal, Family, Tax).
Rules:
- A cannot be in Civil.
- B must be in Family.
- C cannot be in Tax.
- D must be in Civil.
Question:
Which assignment is valid?
- (A) A → Criminal, B → Family, C → Tax, D → Civil
- (B) A → Family, B → Family, C → Criminal, D → Civil
- (C) A → Tax, B → Family, C → Criminal, D → Civil
- (D) A → Civil, B → Family, C → Criminal, D → Tax
Explanation:
- Rule 2 → B fixed at Family.
- Rule 4 → D fixed at Civil.
- Rule 1 → A not Civil.
- Rule 3 → C not Tax.
- Only (C) A → Tax, B → Family, C → Criminal, D → Civil works.
Answer: (C)
Game 9 – Hybrid (Sequencing + Grouping)
Scenario:
Five interns (P, Q, R, S, T) are assigned to two firms (Alpha, Beta). Presentations will be given in order (1–5).
Rules:
- P and Q must be in the same firm.
- R must be in Beta.
- S must present before T.
- P must present before R.
Question:
Which of the following is possible?
- (A) Alpha: P, Q, S | Beta: R, T | Order: S, P, Q, R, T
- (B) Alpha: P, Q, T | Beta: R, S | Order: P, Q, T, S, R
- (C) Alpha: Q, S | Beta: P, R, T | Order: P, S, Q, R, T
- (D) Alpha: P, R | Beta: Q, S, T | Order: P, R, Q, S, T
Explanation:
- Rule 1 → P, Q together.
- Rule 2 → R fixed in Beta.
- Rule 3 → S before T.
- Rule 4 → P before R.
- Only (A) fits.
Answer: (A)
Game 10 – Advanced Sequencing (Dual Conditions)
Scenario:
Seven witnesses (A–G) testify in order.
Rules:
- A must testify before C and D.
- F must testify after C.
- B must be immediately before G.
- E must testify first.
Question:
Which order is valid?
- (A) E, A, C, F, D, B, G
- (B) E, C, A, F, D, B, G
- (C) E, A, D, C, B, G, F
- (D) E, B, G, A, C, D, F
Explanation:
- Rule 4 → E fixed at 1.
- Rule 1 → A before C, D.
- Rule 2 → F after C.
- Rule 3 → B immediately before G.
- Only (A) satisfies all constraints.
Answer: (A)
Next Part: LSAT Analytical Reasoning Logic Games
Explore LSAT Logical Reasoning
You’ve now practiced LSAT Logic Games 1–10 with detailed solutions and explanations. Consistent practice is key to mastering Analytical Reasoning, and these games are designed to help you think logically, organize information, and apply rules effectively under time pressure. Up next, cover Logical Games 11–20 (Part 2) to give you an even broader range of practice. Stay consistent, track your progress, and keep sharpening your reasoning skills to maximize your LSAT performance.