Search

LSAT Logic Games Practice (Games 11–20) with Step-by-Step Explanations [Free]

The LSAT Analytical Reasoning section—commonly called Logic Games—is designed to test how well you can organize information, apply rules, and draw valid conclusions. These skills are essential not just for the exam but for success in law school. In this set, we bring you 10 more free LSAT logic games (Games 11–20) covering a variety of scenarios, including grouping, sequencing, and matching puzzles. Each game comes with clear setups, rules, logical deductions, and fully explained answers. By working through these games, you’ll improve your ability to recognize patterns, avoid common traps, and develop the reasoning speed you need on test day.


LSAT Analytical Reasoning (Logic Games) — Set 2 (Games 11–20)

Game 11 – Grouping (Work Assignments)

Scenario:
A law firm assigns six interns (A, B, C, D, E, F) to two projects: Project X and Project Y. Each intern must work on exactly one project.

Rules:

  1. A and B cannot be on the same project.
  2. C must be on Project X.
  3. If D is on Project X, then E must be on Project Y.
  4. F must be on the same project as A.

Question Example:
If A is on Project X, which group is valid?

Answer:
If A → X, then F → X. Since B cannot be with A, B → Y. C is required in X. D’s placement doesn’t conflict.
✔ Valid grouping: Project X: A, C, F. Project Y: B, D, E.


Game 12 – Sequencing (Court Hearings)

Scenario:
Five hearings (H1–H5) are scheduled in one day.

Rules:

  1. H1 must come before H3.
  2. H2 must be immediately before H4.
  3. H5 cannot be last.

Answer Setup:
Possible valid order: H1 – H2 – H4 – H3 – H5.


Game 13 – Matching (Law Students & Moot Courts)

Scenario:
Three students (P, Q, R) must each argue one of three cases (A, B, C).

Rules:

  1. P cannot argue case B.
  2. R must argue the same case as either P or Q.
  3. Each case must be argued by at least one student.

Answer:
P → A, Q → B, R → A.


Game 14 – Hybrid (Intern Schedule)

Scenario:
Four interns (J, K, L, M) must be scheduled across four time slots (1–4).

Rules:

  1. J must be before K.
  2. L cannot be in slot 2.
  3. M must be after J but before K.

Solution:
Valid order → J (1), M (2), K (3), L (4).


Game 15 – Grouping (Witness Testimony)

Scenario:
Six witnesses (W, X, Y, Z, T, U) must testify in two separate sessions.

Rules:

  1. W and X cannot testify in the same session.
  2. Y must be with T.
  3. Z must be in the first session.

Answer:
Session 1: Z, W, Y, T. Session 2: X, U.


Game 16 – Sequencing (Trial Days)

Scenario:
Five trials (T1–T5) over five days.

Rules:

  1. T2 must occur before T5.
  2. T3 must occur on Day 2.
  3. T1 cannot be after T4.

Answer Example:
Day 1: T1, Day 2: T3, Day 3: T4, Day 4: T2, Day 5: T5.


Game 17 – Matching (Law Professors & Courses)

Scenario:
Professors A, B, and C must each teach one subject (Contracts, Torts, Evidence).

Rules:

  1. A cannot teach Evidence.
  2. If B teaches Torts, then C teaches Evidence.
  3. One subject may be assigned to two professors.

Answer:
A → Contracts, B → Torts, C → Evidence.


Game 18 – Grouping (Law School Clinics)

Scenario:
Seven students (S1–S7) must be divided into two clinics: Civil and Criminal.

Rules:

  1. S1 and S2 must be together.
  2. S3 cannot be with S4.
  3. S5 must be in Civil.

Answer:
Civil: S1, S2, S5, S3. Criminal: S4, S6, S7.


Game 19 – Sequencing (Law Journal Articles)

Scenario:
Five articles (A–E) must be published in a specific order.

Rules:

  1. A must be before C.
  2. D must be after C.
  3. B cannot be last.

Answer Example:
Order → A, B, C, D, E.


Game 20 – Hybrid (Trial Scheduling)

Scenario:
Three trials (X, Y, Z) must be scheduled across three courts in three consecutive weeks.

Rules:

  1. X must be in Court 1.
  2. Y cannot be in Week 1.
  3. Z must be after Y.

Answer:
Week 1: X (Court 1). Week 2: Y (Court 2). Week 3: Z (Court 3).



Game 11 – Grouping (Work Assignments)

Scenario:
A law firm assigns six interns (A, B, C, D, E, F) to two projects: Project X and Project Y. Each intern must work on exactly one project.

Rules:

  1. A and B cannot be on the same project.
  2. C must be on Project X.
  3. If D is on Project X, then E must be on Project Y.
  4. F must be on the same project as A.

Question Example:
If A is on Project X, which group is valid?

Answer:
If A → X, then F → X. Since B cannot be with A, B → Y. C is required in X. D’s placement doesn’t conflict.
✔ Valid grouping: Project X: A, C, F. Project Y: B, D, E.


Game 12 – Sequencing (Court Hearings)

Scenario:
Five hearings (H1–H5) are scheduled in one day.

Rules:

  1. H1 must come before H3.
  2. H2 must be immediately before H4.
  3. H5 cannot be last.

Answer Setup:
Possible valid order: H1 – H2 – H4 – H3 – H5.


Game 13 – Matching (Law Students & Moot Courts)

Scenario:
Three students (P, Q, R) must each argue one of three cases (A, B, C).

Rules:

  1. P cannot argue case B.
  2. R must argue the same case as either P or Q.
  3. Each case must be argued by at least one student.

Answer:
P → A, Q → B, R → A.


Game 14 – Hybrid (Intern Schedule)

Scenario:
Four interns (J, K, L, M) must be scheduled across four time slots (1–4).

Rules:

  1. J must be before K.
  2. L cannot be in slot 2.
  3. M must be after J but before K.

Solution:
Valid order → J (1), M (2), K (3), L (4).


Game 15 – Grouping (Witness Testimony)

Scenario:
Six witnesses (W, X, Y, Z, T, U) must testify in two separate sessions.

Rules:

  1. W and X cannot testify in the same session.
  2. Y must be with T.
  3. Z must be in the first session.

Answer:
Session 1: Z, W, Y, T. Session 2: X, U.


Game 16 – Sequencing (Trial Days)

Scenario:
Five trials (T1–T5) over five days.

Rules:

  1. T2 must occur before T5.
  2. T3 must occur on Day 2.
  3. T1 cannot be after T4.

Answer Example:
Day 1: T1, Day 2: T3, Day 3: T4, Day 4: T2, Day 5: T5.


Game 17 – Matching (Law Professors & Courses)

Scenario:
Professors A, B, and C must each teach one subject (Contracts, Torts, Evidence).

Rules:

  1. A cannot teach Evidence.
  2. If B teaches Torts, then C teaches Evidence.
  3. One subject may be assigned to two professors.

Answer:
A → Contracts, B → Torts, C → Evidence.


Game 18 – Grouping (Law School Clinics)

Scenario:
Seven students (S1–S7) must be divided into two clinics: Civil and Criminal.

Rules:

  1. S1 and S2 must be together.
  2. S3 cannot be with S4.
  3. S5 must be in Civil.

Answer:
Civil: S1, S2, S5, S3. Criminal: S4, S6, S7.


Game 19 – Sequencing (Law Journal Articles)

Scenario:
Five articles (A–E) must be published in a specific order.

Rules:

  1. A must be before C.
  2. D must be after C.
  3. B cannot be last.

Answer Example:
Order → A, B, C, D, E.


Game 20 – Hybrid (Trial Scheduling)

Scenario:
Three trials (X, Y, Z) must be scheduled across three courts in three consecutive weeks.

Rules:

  1. X must be in Court 1.
  2. Y cannot be in Week 1.
  3. Z must be after Y.

Answer:
Week 1: X (Court 1). Week 2: Y (Court 2). Week 3: Z (Court 3).


Previous Part: LSAT Logic Games Part 1

Also Explore LSAT Logical Reasoning

Well done on completing LSAT Logic Games 11–20. Each game was designed to replicate real LSAT exam conditions and provide you with step-by-step guidance. Practicing these regularly will help you build the confidence and accuracy required to tackle even the most complex Analytical Reasoning challenges. Up next, we’ll continue with more advanced sets to ensure you’re fully prepared for test day. Stay focused and consistent—your hard work will pay off with a higher LSAT score.


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Content is protected !!
Scroll to Top